How Many Animal Abuse Cases Were Reported In 2017

• This post may contain chapter links which - at no cost to yous - may generate a small fee for the states if y'all purchase the product. We research, review and test a lot of products and this doesn't bear upon our impartiality. Invariably the coin goes back on products and improving Red Orangish Peach.

• 100'southward of millions of animal tests are performed each year
• China and the Usa are the worst proponents of animal testing
• The EU has had a cosmetic testing ban in place since 2013

Fauna Testing Facts and Statistics Overview

The number of animals used in unnecessary, vicious testing continues to be extraordinary.

Whilst the exact figures are difficult to come by – understandable when you consider the negative PR countries and companies know they'll receive – it's of import to us that we shed a lite on industries that continue to profit from such vile practices.

Particularly ones like cosmetics – vanity industries where at that place's absolutely no need to test whatever product on animals. That'due south why we polish a light on and then many wonderful cruelty-free companies – that we've tested, trust and thoroughly recommend.

Top 11 Nearly Frightening Creature Testing Facts and Statistics

i. It is estimated that the The states performs well over 100 million tests on animal each yr

Because America's Beast Welfare Act (AWA) doesn't include the animals that are primarily used for testing – rats, mice and fish – the figures are wildly underestimated. The latest figures deemed for 780,070 tests.Whereas the number is more probable around the 115 million marking.

2. Only over 20% of the world'southward countries take cosmetic national testing bans in place

41 countries have completely banned cosmetic testing on animals –this includes all of the EU– whilst another 17 are working on information technology.

3. Animal testing in Australia increased by 148% between 2015 – 2017

Whilst Australia has recently implemented a national cosmetic testing ban, Queensland recorded over 12 million tests on domestic fowl in 2017 without a specified purpose.

You tin can detect out more about animal testing in Australia hither.

iv. More than than 90% of compounds tested on animals fail to enter the market

More recent studies estimate fauna testing has a 96% failure rate as it's predictability has reduced.

5. Some animal tests have years to complete and price multiple millions of dollars

Rodent cancer studies are especially expensive and time-consuming. They tin cost $ii – 4 meg per two-species lifetime written report.

six. In that location are fifty validated and – in part – accepted alternatives to fauna testing

Typically alternatives to animal testing are incredibly effective at reducing the number of animals used as they're more cost and time-efficient. In some cases they can be 97% more than cost effective (come across rat 24 calendar month bioassay vs Syrian hamster embryo (SHE) cell transformation examination).

7. The The states spend almost $xx billion of taxpayers money every yr on animal testing

47% of the NIH'south budget for all testing projects in the Usa is spent on funding animal testing.

8. 84,100 animals died in the UK in 2019 every bit a result of brute testing

9. Almost 700,000 animals died across the EU in 2017 equally a result of animal testing

Of the 10,664,752 procedures performed on animals across the European union in 2017, 6.4% were non-recoverable and a further 10.7% (1.fourteen million) were classes as'astringent.'

ten. 100% of HIV vaccines that passed animal tests failed in humans

Of the well-nigh 100 HIV vaccines that passed creature tests, none of them proved successful in human trials.

After HIV vaccine gp120 failed in clinical trials, a BMJ article distinguished how the important differences between NHPs (non-man primates) and humans had led researchers downward a doomed path.

eleven. 79% of people say they would switch if they found out a brand tested products on animals

Yet however brands proceed to go downwards this route – Source: BUAV Poll

How Many Animals are Tested on each yr Globally?

Ultimately 100's of millions of animals are tested on each year.

The worst proponents of creature testing are China, The USA, Australia and Japan. Significantly. It is likely these four countries brand up over l% of all tests on animals across the world.

Number of Animal Tests Performed by Land

The 9 Countries that perform the most Tests on Animals each twelvemonth

Country	Number of Animate being Tests per Year
United states**	100 – 120 million
China*	24 1000000
Australia***	20 million
Nihon	xviii million
Canada	3.8 one thousand thousand
Republic of korea	3.7 million
UK	3.four 1000000
Federal republic of germany	2.8 million
France	ane.9 meg
(European union	ten.9 million)

*China is notoriously difficult to assemble animal testing statistics from equally it's quite a airtight book. However we took data from Cruelty Free International and applied a 20% increase – an increase in line with the rest of the countries on our list (excluding the UK)
**The USA is equally hard to extrapolate accurate animal testing data. According to the US Government statistics, simply 780,070 animals were used in tests – a 5.7% increase from 2017. Only equally the US has no ban in identify, these statistics practice non include all animals. Most mice, rats, and fish are non covered by the Brute Welfare Act – though they are still covered by other regulations that protect animal welfare. So the wide ranging effigy of  upwards to 120 1000000 is a best approximate for the number of animals used in US laboratories.
***Australian fauna testing has exploded in recent years. This has been driven by the employ of 12 million domestic fowl in Queensland in 2017. The total number of animals used in 2017 (20.ii million) jumped from 12 meg in 2016. Alarming figures to say the least.

How Many Countries Take Animal Testing Bans in Identify?

There are 40 Countries with National Corrective Testing Bans in identify as of 2021. Which is twenty.five% of the world's nations.

Then there are a further 17 countries working on implementing bans – some other 8.7%. What complicates the issue are countries like Brazil and The United states where there are fractional bans in place. And we mean partial.

In Brazil, only 6 of the 26 states have approved a ban for cosmetic animal testing. And the U.s.a. is even worse. In America, merely 5 states have banned cosmetic animal testing.

Countries like Canada still don't have any bans on cosmetic animal testing.

Brute Testing Statistics in the United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland

Testing cosmetic products and their ingredients on animals was banned in the Britain in 1998 as part of European union Regulation 1223/2009 (cosmetics regulation).

The ban was created because non-animal methods were adult to test the safety of the cosmetics AND vanity products cannot be classed in the same subclass every bit testing on legitimate medical products.

You can read more virtually the Great britain's brute testing policy here.

Encounter how theEuropean Cosmetics Directivedefines a corrective or vanity product:

---

"Whatever substance or preparation intended to be placed in contact with the various external parts of the human body (epidermis, hair system, nails, lips and external genital organs) or with the teeth and the mucous membranes of the oral cavity with a view exclusively or mainly to cleaning them, perfuming them, changing their appearance and/or correcting body odours and/or protecting them or keeping them in expert condition."

— European Cosmetics Directive

---

4 Major Animate being Testing Facts and Statistics in the UK

Every year the United kingdom government publishes a study on the scientific procedures that occur on living animals.

This gives u.s.a. the opportunity to analyse the current state of play in our own country and to encounter how animal testing has adult over the years.

1. 3,400,000 Procedures on animals in 2019
2. 86% of the animals were mice, fish and rats
3. 16,100 Personal licenses handed out to examination on animals
4. 84,100 Animals died as a outcome

At present, there are 3 licences required by the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Human action 1986 before testing on animals is allowed. The three licences needed are:

1. A personal licence for each person carrying out procedures on animals
2. A project licence for the programme of work
3. An establishment licence for the place at which the work is carried out

So whilst the number of tests are reducing slowly beyond the U.k., the number of applications forpersonal licenses is, at best, concerning.

Animal Testing Facts and Statistics in The EU

• The UK runs the most tests on animals in the Eu, followed past French republic and Germany
• 6.four% of all beast tests were not-recoverable – the subject field died
• In 2017 in that location were over 10 million tests on animals in the EU

Since 2013 the European union has implemented a ban on cosmetic animal testing.

Even so there are still millions of animals born specifically for testing each year and – betwixt 2013 and 2017 – the number of authorised projects has increased by 176%.

And during this timeframe, the number ofinspections – announced or unannounced – barely increased at all. As 70% of adults in EU countries concord that replacing beast testing with non-fauna methods should exist an European union priority, we will continue to

4 Animate being Testing Statistics in the EU

1. 10,664,752 Procedures on animals in 2017
2. 92% of the animals were mice, fish and rats
3. 6.four% of all tests performed were non-recoverable
4. 10.seven% of all tests performed were classed as 'severe'

What Animals were used for Animal Tests in the EU

In 2017, the main species used (for the first fourth dimension) in research and testing in the European union were: mice, fish, rats and birds.

Which together represented 92% of the total number of animals while species of particular public concern (dogs, cats and non-human being primates) represented less than 0.3% of the total number of animals. The same amount equally amphibians, cephalopods and reptiles.

Only every bit the number of beast tests across the European union has increased by 16% betwixt 2017 – 2020, nosotros tin apply the aforementioned increase to become estimates (admitting accurate estimates) for how many animals were used for the beginning time in 2020:

• Mice: 6.6 million
• Fish: 1.4 million
• Rats: 1.28 million
• Birds: 0.64 million

Animal Testing Facts and Statistics in The USA

• The U.s. arguably has the worst and least transparent animal testing policy
• The Animal Welfare Act (AWA) doesn't cover mice, rats or fish – the most widely used animals in enquiry
• Estimates put the number of animals used in beast testing at well over 100 million per year

1. 99% of animals involved in tests aren't included in the Animal Welfare Human activity
2. $nineteen.vi billion spent by the NIH on animal research and testing in 2020
3. xc% of animals aren't included in official statistics
4. seven% of animals weren't given any hurting relief

In 2019, Usa regime statistics put the number of laboratory animals used in enquiry at 797,546, an increment of 2.2% from 2018.

However, considering these statistics exercise non include mice, rats, and fish- animals non covered by the Fauna Welfare Human activity – they are wildly inaccurate. Estimates claim that the number of mice and rats solitary is 111.v million.

We take a more detailed breakdown on animate being testing in the Us here.

Public Perception Statistics of Beast Testing

Americans…
Who oppose animal testing for scientific purposes
52%

Source: Pew Research

If a brand tested on animals…
79% Of people would switch

Source: BUAV Poll

In the U.k.…
38% Believe that cosmetic testing is legal

Source: Department for Energy, Business organisation & Industrial Strategy – Public Attitudes to Animate being Research

65% of the British Public can take animate being testing for medical inquiry…
IF there's no culling

Source: Department for Free energy, Business organization & Industrial Strategy – Public Attitudes to Animal Inquiry

Those who believe that cosmetic testing on animals is permitted in the U.k. are just as likely every bit the rest of the public to say they tin can have the employ of animals in medical inquiry. This context-driven nature of support for beast research needs to be well-documented.

If we're all more aware of societal laws and in particular the ample number of alternatives to beast testing, nosotros can movement towards a kinder globe that no longer supports creature testing in any forms.

What % of Brute Tests are even 'Successful?'

• A test could last up to 2 years and there could be ii,000 animals involved
• More than than 90% of compounds inbound clinical trials fail to gain regulatory approval
• Testing a single active pesticide ingredient takes a decade, costs approximately $71,000,000 and kills upwards to viii,000 animals to complete all of the animal studies required to register one single pesticide

For drug testing alone the average fourth dimension to bring a production to market is 10-xv years.

With a current failure rate of 90% – 55% due to a lack of efficacy and 28% due to the toxic effects in humans – the need for more efficient, sustainable technologies in gamble assessment over electric current paradigms is so blatant it's difficult to comprehend how such barbarian processes are kept alive.

What does the Future concord for Brute Testing?

Information technology's not all doom and gloom. At that place are some initiatives designed to reduce the number of animals involved in testing around the world.

The Future of Creature Testing in The United states

EPA has moved abroad from requiring the testing of potentially harmful chemicals on animals. A decision that hasn't gone down well with numerous research groups and environmentalists.

The E.P.A. Ambassador Andrew Wheeler said the bureau plans to reduce the amount of studies that involve mammal testing by xxx percent by 2025, and to eliminate the studies entirely past 2035.

---

"We are really excited as this has been something we've wanted for quite some time…The alternatives are the future. They're more than efficient and save lives.."

— Kitty Block, President of the Humane Society of the USA

---

The Time to come of Animate being Testing in Red china

Fifty-fifty Cathay, a country lambasted for it'southward approach to animal testing, is looking at loosening steps regarding cosmetic testing on animals.

In July 2020 China's National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) began formulating new restrictions that are believed to elevator the fauna testing requirement. One that requires any cosmetic sold in the country to be tested on animals.

It's the reason why companies that sell in Communist china cannever be labelled every bit cruelty-gratuitous. And why we'd never trust brands who trade their humane responsibility for some quick yen.

Whilst it'south unclear exactly what is probable to happen, we'll take whatever progress we can regarding China'southward fauna testing policies.

The Future of Animal Testing in The European union

So whilst testing cosmetics on animals has been banned in the UK since 1998 and the Eu ban on animal tested cosmetic products was start passed in 1993 – with the full ban taking effect in 2013 – there are still millions of creature tests that occur each year.

10.9 million to be exact!

But according to data provided past Cruelty Free Europe, lxx% of adults in EU countries concur that replacing animal testing with non-animal methods should exist an EU priority. With such potent public backing, nosotros're confident that any non-essential creature testing will soon be made illegal beyond all Eu states.

Additional Sources

The Canadian Council on Animal Care

Recherche Animale Research Statistics

Humane Social club International – Republic of korea

Laboratory Animal Statistics in Germany

Source: https://redorangepeach.com/animal-cruelty/statistics/

Posted by: bivenscovest.blogspot.com

Share this post